jevusecases.work

Use case demo

Trauma-informed policy review

Paragraph in; Noul checks for coercive language, missing support pathways and blame framing; Score alignment. Flags and review notes only — no auto-rewrite publish.

Synthetic demo Proposed design
Shared mailbox · service desk Synthetic demo Proposed design
Inbox · synthetic items
    RulesPolicy in code
    JevChoice · Score · Noul
    Frontier LLMDraft only
    HumanAccountable action
    Inputs

    Select a message.

    Jev + rules

    Judgments appear here.

    Outputs

    Tickets, drafts, queues.

    Pilot card

    What a first pilot of this decision needs. Proposed design, not a measured result.

    DecisionWhich paragraphs of a draft policy need a trauma-informed rewrite?
    State Jev seesOne paragraph at a time, the policy purpose, and the house style guidance excerpt.
    Questions
    • Noul Does the paragraph use threatening or coercive language?
    • Noul Does it describe a sanction without a support pathway?
    • Score How clear is it for someone under stress (1–5)?
    First action code may takeAnnotate the draft with flagged paragraphs for the author.
    Stays with a personAll rewording and sign-off.
    Measure firstFlags accepted by authors; paragraphs changed before approval.
    Microsoft surfaceSharePoint document library; comments added through Graph.
    Out of scopeRewriting policy automatically.